Skip to main content
Tru-Trac

Cases

Real conveyor problems.
Measured outcomes.

Tru-Trac case studies focus on what changed: belt stability, unplanned stoppages, belt life, carryback, spillage, safety exposure, maintenance load and standardisation across the operation. Where customer names are not disclosed, we identify the commodity, region, conveyor condition, failure mode, intervention and outcome. The proof is in the operating result, not the logo.

Customer names shown only where permission has been confirmed.

Evidence file

6 verified cases · 4 commodities · 2 regions

  1. Case 01PGM · Rustenburg, South Africa
    20sto centralise
  2. Case 02Coal · Germany
    12+ movs <1 week prior
  3. Case 03Copper · Zambia
    0structural contact events

02 / Featured case

Production halt reversed after multiple failed tracking interventions.

PGM mining · Rustenburg, South Africa

A PGM operation in Rustenburg experienced a two-day production stoppage after multiple previously installed tracking products failed to resolve the issue.

Before · failure condition

Multiple previously installed tracking products failed to hold the belt true. The belt repeatedly drifted off centre under variable load.

Centralised in

20s

Under full load

After · stabilised condition

Tru-Trac assessed the application, replaced the failed units with two correctly specified belt trackers, and restored production. Belt remained true under full load from the first shift.

Customer anonymised. Outcome based on verified Tru-Trac case material.

Read the Case

03 / Browse the proof

Filter by commodity, region, failure mode, or product family.

Showing all 6 verified cases below.

Commodity

Region

Failure mode

Product family

Get the conveyor problem checklist used in our assessments. Identifies failure modes by observable symptom — same checklist our engineers use on site.

Download the checklist

04 / Pattern of outcomes

Different conveyors. Same pattern of control.

The problem changes by site: mistracking, carryback, spillage, belt-edge damage, idler contamination, fire risk, or emergency stoppages. The pattern is consistent. When the conveyor is assessed correctly and the right control point is specified, downstream cost and risk begin to fall.

  1. 01

    Controlled

    Tracking stability under load

    Observed

    Belt centralised within seconds; held under variable load.

    Context

    PGM, Platinum, Copper

  2. 02

    Controlled

    Extreme-duty performance

    Observed

    Tracker held 12+ months where prior products failed in days.

    Context

    Coal stacker reclaimer, Germany

  3. 03

    Controlled

    Site-wide standardisation

    Observed

    After one belt succeeded, operation adopted the spec across similar belts.

    Context

    PGM, Coal, Copper, Platinum

  4. 04

    Controlled

    Sampler / sealing zone stability

    Observed

    Belt stability at sampler restored sealing system function.

    Context

    Coal overland

  5. 05

    Controlled

    Return-side control

    Observed

    Dual Return Trackers held high-tension wide belts true on return run.

    Context

    Copper tripper conveyor

05 / Methodology

How Tru-Trac builds a case study.

A Tru-Trac case study is built from field evidence. Each case identifies the operating condition, the failure mode, the intervention, and the measured outcome. Where customer names are not shown, the case remains specific through commodity, region, conveyor condition, product family, and result.

  1. 01

    Operating condition

    Belt width, speed, load, material, environment, duty cycle.

  2. 02

    Failure mode

    Mistracking, carryback, spillage, idler failure, belt damage, safety exposure.

  3. 03

    Intervention

    Correctly specified components, installed and commissioned to a documented standard.

  4. 04

    Measured outcome

    Operational result recorded against a baseline; verified before publication.

Request the technical evidence pack for a similar application. We assemble matched-application evidence (belt width, speed, commodity, failure mode) on request.

Request the evidence pack

06 / Customer statements

Verified outcomes, in customer voices.

Approved customer statements that speak to how Tru-Trac validates outcomes — proof-of-concept methodology, accuracy under audit, and ongoing technical support.

  • Belt Scales

    Accurate production, sales and stock measurement is critical to managing the operation properly. The Tru-Trac belt scale helped us improve confidence in the numbers and reduce the time and cost associated with stock reconciliation.

    Lloyd · Works Manager · AfriSam Coedmore Quarry

    Belt-scale accuracy supports better production control, stock management and operational decision-making.

  • Belt Scales

    Tru-Trac proposed a proof-of-concept belt scale installation for one month. After reviewing the results, we were impressed by the accuracy and by the service support. They trained us on in-house calibration, and a technician continues to visit site monthly.

    Dustin · Maintenance Superintendent · AfriSam Coedmore Quarry

    Proof-of-concept installation demonstrated accuracy before full commitment.

Start with the conveyor that keeps coming back.

If the same belt keeps mistracking, spilling, damaging itself, contaminating idlers, or forcing unplanned intervention, the issue is rarely isolated. Tru-Trac can assess the conveyor, identify the failure mode, and recommend the correct control point.